Assembly begins pushing legislative ethics reforms
Ethics
Lawmakers would be barred from accepting more than one taxpayer-paid health insurance plan and from taking campaign donations from their aides under measures pushed forward Thursday by Assembly legislators.
The measures released by the Assembly State Government Committee come as legislators also prepare to revamp an oft-criticized legislative ethics committee.
Legislative staff said it can't be estimated how much money the bill to limit health insurance benefits would save because it is not known how many officials receive benefits under more than one plan.
Still, sponsors said it would be a sensible move, especially with the state suffering chronic fiscal problems.
"Taking action to address this problem will be just one step in a long process of getting government costs under control in New Jersey, but it is a significant step," said the sponsor, Assemblyman Declan O'Scanlon, R-Monmouth, who vowed to introduce legislation to bar all state workers from accepting more than one taxpayer-paid health insurance plan.
Legislators have tried to pass versions of the bill into law since 2003 without success. It passed the Assembly during the last session, but never received Senate consideration.
The measure to bar legislative aides and their immediate family members from making political contributions to the legislator that employs them would continue for two years after an aide stopped working for the legislator.
Violators would face up to 18 months in prison and a fine of up to $10,000.
"While some of these contributions may be well-intentioned, they allow for a form of kickback whereby a legislator pays the salary of the aide with taxpayer funds, and the aide then kicks back those dollars to his or her boss by way of campaign contributions," said Assemblyman Jay Webber, R-Morris, a bill sponsor.
He noted that congressional staffers cannot contribute to their employers.
"This bill strikes a blow against what I call the culture of soft corruption in Trenton," Webber said.
Assembly and Senate committees are scheduled on Monday to weigh a plan pushed by Assembly Speaker Joseph Roberts Jr. to revamp the much-criticized legislative ethics committee, which has chastised few legislators and been rife with partisan bickering.
Roberts wants to remove lawmakers from it and replace them with retired prosecutors, Supreme Court justices and Superior Court judges and give the panel more authority.
Related listings
-
Web Page Disclaimers in New Hampshire
Ethics 02/29/2008Effective January 1, 2008, New Hampshireadopted a rule that clearly protects persons who, in good faith, e-mailconfidential information to a lawyer from having the lawyer use theinformation against the prospective client. The comments to NewHam...
-
Qualcomm v. Broadcom Confidentiality Hurts
Ethics 02/26/2008A blockbuster decision was issued in the notorious “take no prisoners,” “bet the company,” Qualcomm v. Broadcom, Case No. 05cv1958-B, in San Diego. In a heart-wrenching decision, the lawyers are being prevented from disclosing what really occurred, b...
-
Arizona Lawyers May Not Ethically Participate
Ethics 07/06/1999Arizona lawyers may not ethically participate in an Internet servicethat sends legal questions from individuals to attorneys based upon thesubject matter of the question. The opinion also notes that lawyers cannot pay a fee for such referrals or give...
Workers’ Compensation Subrogation of Administrative Fees and Costs
When a worker covered by workers’ compensation makes a claim against a third party, the workers’ compensation insurance retains the right to subrogate against any recovery from that third party for all benefits paid to or on behalf of a claimant injured at work. When subrogating for more than basic medical and indemnity benefits, the Texas workers’ compensation subrogation statute provides that “the net amount recovered by a claimant in a third‑party action shall be used to reimburse the carrier for benefits, including medical benefits that have been paid for the compensable injury.” TX Labor Code § 417.002.
In fact, all 50 states provide for similar subrogation. However, none of them precisely outlines which payments or costs paid by a compensation carrier constitute “compensation” and can be recovered. The result is industry-wide confusion and an ongoing debate and argument with claimants’ attorneys over what can and can’t be included in a carrier’s lien for recovery purposes.
In addition to medical expenses, death benefits, funeral costs and/or indemnity benefits for lost wages and loss of earning capacity resulting from a compensable injury, workers’ compensation insurance carriers also expend considerable dollars for case management costs, medical bill audit fees, rehabilitation benefits, nurse case worker fees, and other similar fees. They also incur other expenses in conjunction with the handling and adjusting of workers’ compensation claims. Workers’ compensation carriers typically assert, of course, that, they are entitled to reimbursement for such expenditures when it recovers its workers’ compensation lien. Injured workers and their attorneys disagree.