St. Louis DWI Defense Lawyer - John M. Lynch
Law Firm Marketing
Our firm founder John M. Lynch is a proven trial lawyer with a record of success in state and federal courts. His former service as a police investigator and federal drug task force agent enable him to see a case from all sides.
He is routinely hired by other attorneys to assist with criminal cases. His peer recognition is also evident in the recognition that he has earned with Top 100 Trial Lawyers, AV Preeminent Rating and Super Lawyers.
Attorney John M. Lynch comes from a strong law enforcement background with a decade of experience as a police investigator and federal drug task force agent. Paired with his legal degree from St. Louis University School of Law, Mr. Lynch provides a unique and candid perspective for people charged with a full range of criminal activities.
His practice includes federal criminal defense, DUI/DWI defense, drug possession defense, white-collar crime defense, personal injury and general trial litigation.
At JML, LLC, we routinely serve clients on a national level, often appearing in courts all across the country for a host of cases, criminal and civil. In Missouri, were serve the entire state, including but not limited to: the City of St. Louis; St. Louis County and surrounding areas (all municipalities), Jefferson County including Arnold, De Soto, Festus, Hillsboro, and Imperial; St. Charles County including O'Fallon, St. Charles, St. Peters, Wentzville and surrounding region, ; Lincoln, Warren and Franklin Counties, Jefferson City, Cole County and surrounding regarding, Kansas City, Jackson County and surrounding region, Springfield and surrounding region.
Contact us today to see how we can help with your case. Your initial consultation is free.
Related listings
-
Japan high court rejects paternity harassment allegations
Law Firm Marketing 06/23/2022A Japanese High Court on Thursday rejected an appeal by a former brokerage manager alleging on-the-job harassment and unlawful dismissal after he took parental leave while working at Mitsubishi UFJ Morgan Stanley.The case of Glen Wood, a Canadian who...
-
CDC restates recommendation for masks on planes, trains
Law Firm Marketing 05/03/2022U.S. health officials on Tuesday restated their recommendation that Americans wear masks on planes, trains and buses, despite a court ruling last month that struck down a national mask mandate on public transportation.Americans age 2 and older should...
-
California Litigation Law Firm Launches New Website
Law Firm Marketing 08/18/2021Law Promo is pleased to announce the launch of the new website for the California real estate litigation law firm website. About Dagrella Law Firm, PLC is a boutique litigation practice specializing in exceptionally complex and challenging disputes a...
Workers’ Compensation Subrogation of Administrative Fees and Costs
When a worker covered by workers’ compensation makes a claim against a third party, the workers’ compensation insurance retains the right to subrogate against any recovery from that third party for all benefits paid to or on behalf of a claimant injured at work. When subrogating for more than basic medical and indemnity benefits, the Texas workers’ compensation subrogation statute provides that “the net amount recovered by a claimant in a third‑party action shall be used to reimburse the carrier for benefits, including medical benefits that have been paid for the compensable injury.” TX Labor Code § 417.002.
In fact, all 50 states provide for similar subrogation. However, none of them precisely outlines which payments or costs paid by a compensation carrier constitute “compensation” and can be recovered. The result is industry-wide confusion and an ongoing debate and argument with claimants’ attorneys over what can and can’t be included in a carrier’s lien for recovery purposes.
In addition to medical expenses, death benefits, funeral costs and/or indemnity benefits for lost wages and loss of earning capacity resulting from a compensable injury, workers’ compensation insurance carriers also expend considerable dollars for case management costs, medical bill audit fees, rehabilitation benefits, nurse case worker fees, and other similar fees. They also incur other expenses in conjunction with the handling and adjusting of workers’ compensation claims. Workers’ compensation carriers typically assert, of course, that, they are entitled to reimbursement for such expenditures when it recovers its workers’ compensation lien. Injured workers and their attorneys disagree.