Eugene, Oregon Stalking Order Attorneys
Law Firm Marketing
Our lawyers here in Oregon have seen real world example of clients' lives being extremely affected by erroneous stalking order petitions. And in our experience working in the field, most stalking order cases usually do not have a trial and are dismissed beforehand. Most people who file false stalking orders do it on poor advice from their friends, family, and lawyers with little to no experience in these cases. Although dismissing a case is a satisfying result, it is still unacceptable that courts are receiving and granting these orders to begin with. The whole process must use taxpayer's money and takes time to sort out these issues. Petitioners filing a stalking order simply because they want to avoid contacting sn ex-suitor should not take such aggressive approach to discourage having their ex-suitor contacting them. These stalking orders should be saved for real situations in which you may be harmed by domestic violence abusers.
Our lawyers here believe your life shouldn't be risked and ruined by a stalking protective order. We understand what a hassle a stalking order defense can have on people. We have experience in this field and have successful outcomes to show for it. Make the best of your Oregon attorney choice and call us today at 541-338-9111 or visit our website at http://www.stalkingorder.com to contact one of our stalking defense attorneys at our firm.
Related listings
-
Michigan Law Firm Adds Top Rated Malpractice Attorney
Law Firm Marketing 01/16/2012The Michigan personal injury law firm of Buckfire & Buckfire, P.C. is proud to announce the addition of medical malpractice attorney Randall M. Blau to our team of already award winning, experienced Michigan medical malpractice lawyers! Partner a...
-
Dyer & Berens LLP Files Class Action Lawsuit
Law Firm Marketing 10/26/2011Dyer & Berens LLP announced that it has filed a class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado on behalf of all persons who purchased or otherwise acquired the common stock of AgFeed Industries, Inc. between...
-
Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC Announces Class Action
Law Firm Marketing 08/30/2011Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC announces that it has filed a class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against SinoTech Energy Limited, and certain of its officers, directors and underwriters. The l...
Workers’ Compensation Subrogation of Administrative Fees and Costs
When a worker covered by workers’ compensation makes a claim against a third party, the workers’ compensation insurance retains the right to subrogate against any recovery from that third party for all benefits paid to or on behalf of a claimant injured at work. When subrogating for more than basic medical and indemnity benefits, the Texas workers’ compensation subrogation statute provides that “the net amount recovered by a claimant in a third‑party action shall be used to reimburse the carrier for benefits, including medical benefits that have been paid for the compensable injury.” TX Labor Code § 417.002.
In fact, all 50 states provide for similar subrogation. However, none of them precisely outlines which payments or costs paid by a compensation carrier constitute “compensation” and can be recovered. The result is industry-wide confusion and an ongoing debate and argument with claimants’ attorneys over what can and can’t be included in a carrier’s lien for recovery purposes.
In addition to medical expenses, death benefits, funeral costs and/or indemnity benefits for lost wages and loss of earning capacity resulting from a compensable injury, workers’ compensation insurance carriers also expend considerable dollars for case management costs, medical bill audit fees, rehabilitation benefits, nurse case worker fees, and other similar fees. They also incur other expenses in conjunction with the handling and adjusting of workers’ compensation claims. Workers’ compensation carriers typically assert, of course, that, they are entitled to reimbursement for such expenditures when it recovers its workers’ compensation lien. Injured workers and their attorneys disagree.