MJM Law Office, P.C. - Eugene DUI and Criminal Defense Lawyer
Notable Attorneys
Located in the heart of downtown Eugene, Oregon, MJM Law Office, P.C. focuses on serving clients in Lane County, Oregon. MJM Law Office, P.C. provides clients with quality representation in DUII Cases and Criminal Defense, including matters such as Repeat DUII Offenses, Drug Crimes, Property Crimes, Campus Crimes, and Assault.
Mr. Mizejewski understands that effectively working through the legal system is a challenging process. MJM Law Office, P.C. provides a personalized approach with clients to work closely and help client's understand and resolve their issues. MJM Law Office takes the time to listen and understand each client's situation and explain the available options. There are many options when facing criminal charges that can reduce or eliminate a conviction, including but not limited to the following: diversion, deferred prosecution, drug court, suppression of evidence obtained during an illegal search or seizure, plea negotiations, pre-trial motions, or acquittal at trial by a jury of your peers.
We proudly serve clients in Lane County, Linn County, Benton County and Douglas County communities, including Eugene, Springfield, Coburg, Creswell, Cottage Grove, Lowell, Oakridge, Veneta, Junction City, Florence, Roseburg, Corvallis and Albany.
If you're in need of a Eugene DUI and Criminal Defense Lawyer, contact the MJM Law Office, P.C. today!
Related listings
-
Jackson Trial Lawyers - Cardiff Personal Injury Lawyer
Notable Attorneys 05/05/2014The attorneys at the Law Offices of Robert W. Jackson, APC are trial lawyers. We know how to prepare and present your case. We will not be bullied around by any insurance company. We will fight for you. If you've been injured in an accident, your cla...
-
The Salazar Law Firm, PLLC - Houston Car Accident Lawyers
Notable Attorneys 05/02/2014The Salazar Law Firm, PLLC is a Houston - based personal injury law firm offering an array of services to individuals and businesses. We focus on total satisfaction through constant communication and individualized attention to each client's goal. Ou...
-
W. Bradley Ney - Washington, DC Business Litigation Lawyer
Notable Attorneys 04/30/2014Whether you're an individual, small, or medium-sized business, you deserve the finest legal representation to litigate your civil and criminal matters from an experienced attorney. You need an attorney who understands your and fights for your goals. ...
Workers’ Compensation Subrogation of Administrative Fees and Costs
When a worker covered by workers’ compensation makes a claim against a third party, the workers’ compensation insurance retains the right to subrogate against any recovery from that third party for all benefits paid to or on behalf of a claimant injured at work. When subrogating for more than basic medical and indemnity benefits, the Texas workers’ compensation subrogation statute provides that “the net amount recovered by a claimant in a third‑party action shall be used to reimburse the carrier for benefits, including medical benefits that have been paid for the compensable injury.” TX Labor Code § 417.002.
In fact, all 50 states provide for similar subrogation. However, none of them precisely outlines which payments or costs paid by a compensation carrier constitute “compensation” and can be recovered. The result is industry-wide confusion and an ongoing debate and argument with claimants’ attorneys over what can and can’t be included in a carrier’s lien for recovery purposes.
In addition to medical expenses, death benefits, funeral costs and/or indemnity benefits for lost wages and loss of earning capacity resulting from a compensable injury, workers’ compensation insurance carriers also expend considerable dollars for case management costs, medical bill audit fees, rehabilitation benefits, nurse case worker fees, and other similar fees. They also incur other expenses in conjunction with the handling and adjusting of workers’ compensation claims. Workers’ compensation carriers typically assert, of course, that, they are entitled to reimbursement for such expenditures when it recovers its workers’ compensation lien. Injured workers and their attorneys disagree.